One of my efforts to support the cost of distilling our own LLM is by building more 分离式系统.
The principle is straightforward:
Do not use an LLM for work that has already become predictable.
Every week, I aim to build around a dozen heavy 分离式系统, supported by the research needed to understand the workflow, identify patterns, define rules, and validate the 系统.
For more complex problems, I may first use ChatGPT or Claude as a higher-level reasoning and research layer.
The flow then becomes:
复杂 问题 → 研究 → 推理 → 蒸馏 → 确定性 Logic → 智能路由 → DeepSeek V4 Flash / Our Own LLM → 执行
The important part is what happens after deterministic logic.
If the workload can be solved through rules, parsers, validation, or structured logic, the 独立系统 handles it directly.
If more reasoning is required, the workload is routed to DeepSeek V4 Flash as a cost-efficient external model.
For specialised, strategic, sensitive, or sovereignty-related workloads, the 系统 can instead route the task to our own LLM models.
So this is not about eliminating LLMs.
It is about using them selectively.
确定性 first.
成本-efficient LLM when required.
Our own LLM when specialised intelligence, control, or sovereignty matters.
This architecture also supports the economics of building our own models.
The more workloads we detach, the lower our recurring token and inference costs.
The lower those costs become, the more resources we can redirect into model distillation, evaluation, infrastructure, and development of our own LLM ecosystem.
That is one of the core ideas behind AINNA NeuralOps.
#AINNA #NeuralOps #分离式系统 #LLM #AI蒸馏 #主权AI #AI基础设施 #DeepSeek #ChatGPT #Claude #企业版AI #自动化
Ruang pembaca
Apa pendapat anda?
Komen disemak sebelum diterbitkan. 电子邮件 diperlukan untuk moderasi dan tidak dipaparkan kepada pembaca.
这篇内容让我更容易理解为什么higher-level值得关注。
我会把cost-efficient这一段分享给需要了解技术的同事。
关于our own LLM when specialised的风险和限制还可以再展开，不过基础说明已经很好。
我对成本-efficient LLM when required还有问题，但文章已经提供了很好的起点。
难得有人把sovereignty-related讲得这么直白。
总结部分让higher-level的重点更加清楚。
文章对cost-efficient的结论比较平衡，不只是强调好处。
这篇文章对cost-efficient的解释很清楚，实际操作的重点也很容易理解。