Every seminar, meeting, and symposium now discusses AI as if one autonomous agent can replace an entire company by next Monday.
After enough slides, even the audience starts believing it.
A simple analogy: imagine a hospital deciding that specialist doctors can do everything. So it removes the nurses, medical assistants, pharmacists, receptionists, cleaners, security guards, and support staff.
It sounds impressive during a seminar.
It becomes a disaster when the hospital actually needs to operate.
The same thing is happening with AI.
Some companies rushed to replace people with autonomous agents, only to face hallucinations, weak guardrails, uncontrolled token costs, inconsistent results, and eventually the quiet rehiring of the same positions.
I prefer a detached 系统.
AI helps build the 系统. 固定规则 handle repeatable processes. Humans remain involved for control, judgment, and accountability.
Our 银行 Statement 对账 系统 follows this approach: less hype, lower cost, repeatable results, and people still in the loop.
AI should strengthen an organisation, not remove the common sense required to run it.
#Artificial智能 #AI自动化 #分离式系统 #HumanInTheLoop #中小企业 #商业自动化 #AI治理 #DigitalTransformation
Ruang pembaca
Apa pendapat anda?
Komen disemak sebelum diterbitkan. 电子邮件 diperlukan untuk moderasi dan tidak dipaparkan kepada pembaca.
关于humans remain involved for control的说明很完整，基础部分尤其清楚。
关于inconsistent results的例子很实用，适合团队继续讨论。
如果可以继续说明固定规则 handle repeatable processes的真实案例，我会想继续阅读。