演示 · website-ops carbon compare

估算 monthly CO₂e of conventional LLM-first website management versus NeuralOps detached-first routing. Same formula as the AINNA 碳模拟器.

ESG · compute efficiency

碳 print: NeuralOps vs conventional website operations

This section estimates the compute energy and CO₂e of managing a hospital website and journal — audits, drafts, SEO, link checks, logs — not the carbon of every public page view. 图表 use the same layer model as the AINNA 碳模拟器.

What is compared

传统: most operational tasks are sent to a large language model. NeuralOps: detached systems and rules handle scans, backups and validation; a model is used only when language or judgement is required.

Grounded factors

电网 factor default 0.74 kg CO₂e/kWh, PUE 1.4, and kWh per 1,000 requests by layer — all defaults from the AINNA 碳模拟器. Token reduction of up to 87% is an internal benchmark on a tested language workload, not a hospital-site measurement.

What this is not

Not a certified carbon audit. Not a claim of KPMC’s actual emissions. Not a guarantee of 87% reduction on every task. Adjust the sliders; the model recalculates 实时.

网站-operations workload (monthly)

传统 mix: 70% GPU / 20% light / 8% rule / 2% detached. NeuralOps mix: 5% / 15% / 20% / 60% (emulator presets).

传统 CO₂e

— kWh

NeuralOps CO₂e

— kWh

估算 reduction

— kg CO₂e / month

— kg / year

语言-task token note
≤87%

内部 benchmark on tested token workload — 已施加 only as context, not multiplied into the kg figure.

LayerWhat it represents for website opskWh / 1,000 tasks传统 shareNeuralOps share
GPU 密集型 AI完整 LLM for every rewrite, scan summary or log read0.1570%5%
轻量 AI / CPUShort classification or title suggestion0.0520%15%
规则-based验证, metadata, schema, spelling lists0.018%20%
独立式 系统Link crawl, sitemap, backup check, uptime probe0.0052%60%

估算 / simulation only. Formula: tasks × layer share × (kWh per 1,000 tasks) × PUE × grid factor. 来源: AINNA 碳模拟器 defaults. 更改 any input to see sensitivity. Do not treat the result as audited hospital ESG data.